28 Years Later

[Paul L]

I never saw the second one, don't know why. This looks great!

28 WEEKS is worth catching, Scott.

[f.ramses]

Was recently wondering if we would ever see another one of these and am glad to hear that we will.

[Scott]

I never saw the second one, don't know why. This looks great!

[Paul L]

Nothing much to add other than the opening sequence of 28 WEEKS LATER is still phenomenal.

[agent999]

Reportedly much of this one was shot on an iPhone.

Well, I guess they can do 4k so theoretically decent, but still a huge gimmick.

[Ian Jane]

Trailer looks decent enough, but plenty of people seem to be proclaiming it as a masterpiece. Maybe I'm missing something?

I saw the first at the cinema, never did understand why they chose to shoot it on crap-def video. Some of those deserted London shots could have been awesome if you could see them properly.

Reportedly much of this one was shot on an iPhone.

[agent999]

Trailer looks decent enough, but plenty of people seem to be proclaiming it as a masterpiece. Maybe I'm missing something?

I saw the first at the cinema, never did understand why they chose to shoot it on crap-def video. Some of those deserted London shots could have been awesome if you could see them properly.

[Anthony A]

I haven’t seen the first two installments in a long time but I remember that I liked them both. Really looking forward to the third!

[Ian Jane]

"It may be 28 Years Later, but the long-gestating Danny Boyle and Alex Garland zombie apocalypse sequel looks worth the wait on the evidence of the first trailer.

Accompanied by the unsettling sound of a Taylor Holmes recording of Rudyard Kipling’s war poem “Boots,” the trailer features a post-apocalyptic world in which Aaron Taylor-Johnson walks the green fields of England wielding a bow and arrow."

More here:

https://deadline.com/2024/12/28-year...el-1236199299/