Originally posted by Flash
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Vinegar Syndrome Discussion Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rakesh R. View PostThere is a brief shot involving a dog during an orgy scene.Last edited by Fundi; 07-30-2016, 01:37 AM.
Comment
-
Ahh Yes Alpha France, but I don't remember the dog scene in it. Wonderful picture quality tho'.
They must have used that negative previous posts refer to.Last edited by Keith H; 07-30-2016, 12:31 PM.
Comment
-
Alpha France wouldn't care if the negative was seized by customs since they know they would never see it again anyway. VS has made it clear that they feel they (or I should say the de Renzy estate) own it. As I said, the problem is that they feel de Renzy gave them the negative.
There's a number of scenes in the film that would cause problems. The ending is highly questionable (I know it's fake but that doesn't matter) and other scenes involving violence/rape are problematic. This is why the film was considered unreleasable after the crackdown on adult films in the mid 80s.
Comment
-
I feel like I should make some clarifications here before rumors become fact.
1) Alpha France very likely has the negative, however they might have given it to Mascotte Film (equally problematic for their dubious claims of ownership of deRenzy films in Germany; when I asked them to prove it, they stopped responding to emails).
2) It's not that AF has literally refused to return it, it's that they've simply been unresponsive, period.
3) As for why the negative was sent to Europe in the first place, it was very common practice for original negatives to be shipped internationally for prints (or dupes) to be made. It was unfortunately just as common for the originals not to be returned afterwards. Typically, Euro licenses were for theatrical rights only (especially considering this is a 1975 film, home video wouldn't have even been an option) and ran anywhere from 5-15 years.
4) If we ever get the negative, we will not cut the film. We've never censored a film and don't intend to start.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Lyons View PostI feel like I should make some clarifications here before rumors become fact.
1) Alpha France very likely has the negative, however they might have given it to Mascotte Film (equally problematic for their dubious claims of ownership of deRenzy films in Germany; when I asked them to prove it, they stopped responding to emails).
2) It's not that AF has literally refused to return it, it's that they've simply been unresponsive, period.
3) As for why the negative was sent to Europe in the first place, it was very common practice for original negatives to be shipped internationally for prints (or dupes) to be made. It was unfortunately just as common for the originals not to be returned afterwards. Typically, Euro licenses were for theatrical rights only (especially considering this is a 1975 film, home video wouldn't have even been an option) and ran anywhere from 5-15 years.
4) If we ever get the negative, we will not cut the film. We've never censored a film and don't intend to start.Last edited by Rakesh R.; 07-30-2016, 11:47 PM.
Comment
-
I remember reading Lasse Braun say he bought a number of negatives that were struck of US films from Reuben Sturman. When I saw AF releases of mint condition prints of Femmes and Waterpower I assumed that these were some of the negatives mentioned. The US negative would be long gone for the reasons Thomas mentioned, only AF kept them in good condition as they have almost all their classic catalogue.
Comment
-
I've seen a rip of the Alpha France DVD and it looks spectacular and indeed has the dog scene intact. If anyone knows where I could get hold of this legendary double feature of grim misogynism, please let me know.
On another note, I watched Wakefield Poole's Boys in the Sand yesterday, in honour of the Pride weekend going on in Stockholm, and I thought it was great. Seldom have I seen such tender, dreamy and romantic sex in straight porn. It's a film that oozes of freedom and joy. Having now seen both Boys in the Sand and Bijou, where do I further venture in the world of gay pornography?
Comment
-
Originally posted by enandalusiskhund View PostOn another note, I watched Wakefield Poole's Boys in the Sand yesterday, in honour of the Pride weekend going on in Stockholm, and I thought it was great. Seldom have I seen such tender, dreamy and romantic sex in straight porn. It's a film that oozes of freedom and joy. Having now seen both Boys in the Sand and Bijou, where do I further venture in the world of gay pornography?
Originally posted by John Lyons at AV ManiacsHere are some crucial films in alphabetical order:
BIJOU (Wakefield Poole, 1972)
CONFESSIONS OF A MALE GROUPIE (Tom DeSimone, 1971)
CRUISIN' 57 (Toby Ross, 1975)
DESTROYING ANGEL (Peter DeRome, 1976)
DO ME EVIL (Toby Ross, 1976)
DRIVE (Jack Deveau, 1974)
EL PASO WRECKING CORP (Joe Gage, 1977)
EXPERIMENT, THE (Gorton Hall, 1973)
FALCONHEAD (Michael Zen, 1975)
GHOST OF A CHANCE (Gorton Hall, 1973)
GREEK LIGHTING (Warren Stephens, 1973)
HEATSTROKE (Joe Gage, 1982)
KANSAS CITY TRUCKING COMPANY (Joe Gage, 1976)
L.A. PLAYS ITSELF (Fred Halsted, 1972)
L.A. TOOL AND DIE (Joe Gage, 1979)
LIGHT FROM THE SECOND STORY WINDOW (David Allen)
PASSING STRANGERS (Arthur Bressan Jr., 1974)
PIER GROUPS (Arch Brown, 1980)
SEXTOOL (Fred Halsted, 1975)
THAT BOY (Peter Berlin, 1975)
I can't give too many more personal recommendations - I still haven't had a chance to properly dive into most of the films on John's list, something I need to rectify soon - but I'm sure there are plenty of people around here who can give you more suggestions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by enandalusiskhund View PostIf anyone knows where I could get hold of this legendary double feature of grim misogynism, please let me know.
However, I always take Kultvideo's availability status with a pinch of salt.I'm bitter, I'm twisted, James Joyce is fucking my sister.
Comment
Comment